mRNA and Zombies


April 1, 2025 by Laurianne Macdonald, B.Sc., MPH, CHt, and Licensed RTT Practitioner

“SCIENCE” is all agog again about mRNA tech.

It’s creeping me out. Maybe not bugout-bag time yet… but I’m keeping my ear to the ground, doors locked, and Katana close.

There was a time when the FDA, CDC, and other protective agencies did their job. A time when even a single soul injured or killed by food, pharmaceutical or any other consumable was enough to clear the shelves. Like back in 1982 during the Tylenol murders. The danger was real and the FDA swooped in like batman. The OTC (over the counter) market was changed for the better, saving countless lives since. In 1992 Temafloxacin, a powerful antibiotic, was taken off the market after three patients died. That Jekyll and Hyde medicine lived only six months.

More recently, our protective agencies have been weighed, they have been measured, and they are found wanting. When you are done here, you may want to read “Please, sir, I want some more” if you have not already.

For today’s purposes let’s look at Zantac – A medicine used daily for decades by millions to treat heartburn and acid reflux. In April 2020, the FDA finally recalled all products containing ranitidine, like Zantac, because N-nitroso dimethylamine (NDMA) is a known human carcinogen.

I’m not going to cry in my cocoa puffs about the “substantial” financial losses for pharmaceutical companies and their stockholders. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) paid out $2.2 billion and their stock plummeted. They should of thought about that before concealing the known cancer risk in their product for nearly 40 years.

I console myself only with the knowledge that everyone who made a nickel on Zantac will be spending it in hell.

The official apology from the FDA went as follows: “The FDA is committed to ensuring that the medicines Americans take are safe and effective. We make every effort to investigate potential health risks and provide our recommendations to the public based on the best available science. We didn’t observe unacceptable levels of NDMA in many of the samples that we tested. However, since we don’t know how or for how long the product might have been stored, we decided that it should not be available to consumers and patients unless its quality can be assured,” said Janet Woodcock, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “The FDA will continue our efforts to ensure impurities in other drugs do not exceed acceptable limits so that patients can continue taking medicines without concern.”

Excuse me, but however, is not allowed in apologies. Didn’t your mother teach you anything.

And… safety issues, such as when a drug causes serious side effects over long term use is why the FDA exists. By law, the agency must take into account the number of people using the the drug in its risk ratio. That 95% Confidence Index (CI) is actually something. More about that in a moment.

Just keep in mind the goal of our health care system, practitioners, and protectors is to do NO harm.

Unfortunately, to allow a percentage of harm according to how much big-pharma can afford because of money saved on R&D – humanity as test subjects and bribing cherry picking scientists rather than paying for ethical scientists – well it’s become the industry standard.

The why when and how of recalls because of that failing infrastructure is disturbing. If nothing else it pleads a probe into why the push for mRNA vaccines getting dubbed the holy grail of science and virology.

Especially while the HRSA (Health Resource and Services Administration) has an entire website for reporting vaccine injury. Yes, there have been so many vaccine related injuries, our global governments must make reparations. Curiouser and curiouser. The HRSA and other compensation agencies are using tax dollars to fund the bureaucracy and pay reparations.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying the injured should not be compensated. Just that the compensation should come out of the trillions in profits pharmaceutical companies make, as well as the millions each political cohort banked during the whole Covid-19 control experiment done on the world’s population.

They should also have to cover the cost of some real research done by real scientists for a couple of decades. Especially before mandating mRNA vaccines in any way.

And let’s not dub anything miraculous that doesn’t come from God.

Humans, even know-it-all scientists, are fallible. Always will be. A multi country and cultural cohort study published in 2024 revealed that not only did the pre-established CI risks for  anaphylaxis, myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis exceed intentions, but “other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified“.

First, what exactly does “other” mean. I want a detailed list of markers. And why the skip-to-my-lou past “pre-established CI”. Dub the Twilight Zone music… dunno-dunno…dunno-dunno..dunno-dunno… Yes, you will start to question what lurks under your bed or in the closet more often.

Did you know they knew you were at considerably higher risk for many very serious and deadly side effects after taking the jab?

Did you know that Consent to Treat contract you signed waived your legal rights to file suite for not knowing?

Why would they do that? Because they also knew nobody would read the fine print. Pandemic panic putrefied brains and turned most of us into good little zombies that did as we were told.

But I think it is about time to go where “THEY” never thought we would. To dare and pull back the covers and face whatever it is hiding under the bed.

So, let’s actually follow the science.

Actual Results From the 2024 Yale Study

Participants included 99,068,901 vaccinated individuals. In total, 183,559,462 doses of BNT162b2, 36,178,442 doses of mRNA-1273, and 23,093,399 doses of ChAdOx1 were administered across participating sites in the study period. Risk periods following homologous vaccination schedules contributed 23,168,335 person-years of follow-up. OE ratios with LBCI > 1.5 were observed for Guillain-Barré syndrome (2.49, 95 % CI: 2.15, 2.87) and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (3.23, 95 % CI: 2.51, 4.09) following the first dose of ChAdOx1 vaccine. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis showed an OE ratio of 3.78 (95 % CI: 1.52, 7.78) following the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine. The OE ratios for myocarditis and pericarditis following BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChAdOx1 were significantly increased with LBCIs > 1.5. (5)

What a 3.23 95% CI of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Really Means: Mortality Rate of 9.4%.

  • Relative Risk (RR) or Odds Ratio (OR) of 3.23 with a 95% CI: “THEY” knew 5,928,971 out of the total 183,559,462 exposures to the vaccine were likely to suffer this side effect.
  • And now they know each exposure significantly increases that odds ratio by 1.5% per exposure. Each consecutive inoculation increased the risk exponentially: 2nd jab = 8,682,363 will suffer this side effect. 3rd jab = 11,435,754 will suffer this side effect.
  • 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 2.51 to 4.09: “THEY” believed the (RR) relative risk or odds ratio with 95% certainty. “THEY” were okay with over 6% of those taking the 3rd jab suffering this terrible and life threatening side effect. That means 6 in every 100 of the 3rd jab participants was at consideral risk.
  • Interpretation: The relative risk or odds ratio of 3.23 with a 95% CI of 2.51 to 4.09 indicates a significant and strong association the event (Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis) is likely to occur in 5,928,971 of the exposed total of 183,559,462 people given the mRNA Covid-19 vaccine.
  • With a mortality rate of 9.4% for Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis , 557,323 people likely died because of the inoculation with the first jab. 10.9% with the second… and 12.4% with number three. How many ‘Life Saving’ vaccines did you survive?

What a 2.49 95% CI of Guillain-Barré syndrome Really Means: Mortality Rate of 7.5%.

  • Relative Risk (RR) or Odds Ratio (OR) of 2.49 with a 95% CI: “THEY” knew 4,570,630 out of the total 183,559,462 exposures to the vaccine were likely to suffer this side effect.
  • And now they know each exposure significantly increases that odds ratio by 1.5% per exposure. Each consecutive inoculation increased the risk exponentially: 2nd jab = 7,324,023 will suffer this side effect. 3rd jab = 10,077,414 will suffer this side effect.
  • 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 2.49 to 2.87: “THEY” believed the (RR) relative risk or odds ratio with 95% certainty.
  • Interpretation: The relative risk or odds ratio of 2.49 with a 95% CI of 2.15 to 2.87 indicates a significant and strong association the event Guillian-Barre syndrome is likely to occur in 4,570,630 of the exposed total of 183,559,462 people given the mRNA Covid-19 vaccine.
  • With death rate of 7.5% for Guillain-Barre Syndrome 342,797 people died because of the inoculation with the first jab. 411, 357 with the second…

Need I go on? I mean, math is just as arduous for me as it is for you, so I really hope you are getting the point: Millions of people died because of mRNA vaccine.

How many of those millions did they list as dying of Covid… we may never know.

“Follow the science.. they demanded!” We’ve come a long way from the days when it took only one or two deaths to completely kybosh the alchemy of a medication, no matter how much money it would cost the company who created it.

So far, the actual research done regarding the effectiveness of the Covid mRNA vaccine on stopping the spread and dangerous mutations of the virus, globally, are as murky as the rest of the waters we’ve been wading through for the last five years.

Closer to shore, I personally know more than four people who have suffered serious mRNA vaccine injury. How many do you know?

And now you can add “post vaccine syndrome” (PVS) to the litany of mRNA malfeasance. According to a 2025 Yale study, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is also frequently reactivated in PVS patients. If you have ever suffered EBV, or know someone who has, you can appreciate how such a sickening sequel will suck.

We may never fully know the extent of this dark matter, but suffice it to say, PVS adds to an ever increasing list of chronic diseases dispensed by big-pharma’s bad Covid-19 science.

FYI: Some symptoms of PVS include exercise intolerance, excessive fatigue, brain fog, insomnia, and dizziness. They develop within a day or two after the jab and become more severe over time. Find out if you qualify for benefits through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program – https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation.

But do not be surprised if the your claim gets ignored or denied. Apparently the consent you signed to get your vaccine, and the new push for mRNA appreciation has thrown a wrench in the works.

I cannot help but envision the Sphinx and her riddle-me-this ways as I ask- How often you consider the seven trillion cells that work together to form the systems that make up your body and life – how miraculous the scaffolding that houses your soul really is?

For those that answer NEVER, I gnawed only at your faith in SCIENCE with this essay.

But beware, you will be eaten alive eventually. The “THEY” zombies are out there.

For those that believe in the divine anatomy of each and every one of those cells you so sorely underappreciated… pray for redemption and forgiveness.

For those that trusted in our God and His promise, blessings are upon you. Just “follow the science” and you will know, in the very near future. Because the truth will not stay buried for long.

Resources

  • COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals. ,K. Faksova, D. Walsh, Y. Jiang, J. Griffin, A. Phillips, A. Gentile, J.C. Kwong, K. Macartney, M. Naus, Z. Grange, S. Escolano, G. Sepulveda, A. Shetty, A. Pillsbury, C. Sullivan, Z. Naveed, N.Z. Janjua, N. Giglio, J. Perälä, S. Nasreen, H. Gidding, P. Hovi, T. Vo, F. Cui, L. Deng, L. Cullen, M. Artama, H. Lu, H.J. Clothier, K. Batty, J. Paynter, H. Petousis-Harris, J. Buttery, S. Black, A. Hviid,
    Volume 42, Issue 9, 2024,Pages 2200-2211, ISSN 0264-410X,
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.100.
    (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270)

2. https://www.mctlaw.com/vaccine-injury/vaccinations/coronavirus-covid-19/february- 2025-data-release-shows-the-cicp-is-failing-covid-vaccine-injury-victims/

3. https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data

4. https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data/table-4

5. Immunological and Antigenic Signatures Associated with Chronic Illnesses after COVID-19 Vaccination Bornali Bhattacharjee, Peiwen Lu, Valter, Silva Monteiro, Alexandra Tabachnikova, Kexin Wang, William B. Hooper, Victoria Bastos, Kerrie Greene,  ProfileMitsuaki Sawano, Christian Guirgis, Tiffany, Tzeng, Frederick Warner, Pavlina Baevova, Kathy Kamath, Jack Reifert, Danice Hertz, Brianne Dressen, Laura Tabacof, Jamie Wood, Lily Cooke, Mackenzie Doerstling, Shadan Nolasco, Amer Ahmed, Amy Proal, David Putrino, Leying Guan,  View ORCID ProfileHarlan M. Krumholz,  Akiko Iwasaki
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379
https://news.yale.edu/2025/02/19/immune-markers-post-vaccination-syndrome-indicate-future-research-directions

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-requests-removal-all-ranitidine-products-zantac-market

6. Find out if you qualify for benefits through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program – https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation

7. Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) is reporting “Thousands of Claims Denied or Stuck in Review” for 2025, though over $9Billion was paid out in 2024.

8. Immunological and Antigenic Signatures Associated with Chronic Illnesses after COVID-19 Vaccination https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1

9. COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals,. K. Faksova, D. Walsh, Y. Jiang, J. Griffin, A. Phillips, A. Gentile, J.C. Kwong, K. Macartney, M. Naus, Z. Grange, S. Escolano, G. Sepulveda, A. Shetty, A. Pillsbury, C. Sullivan, Z. Naveed, N.Z. Janjua, N. Giglio, J. Perälä, S. Nasreen, H. Gidding, P. Hovi, T. Vo, F. Cui, L. Deng, L. Cullen, M. Artama, H. Lu, H.J. Clothier, K. Batty, J. Paynter, H. Petousis-Harris, J. Buttery, S. Black, A. Hviid, Vaccine, Volume 42, Issue 9, 2024, Pages 2200-2211, ISSN 0264-410X,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.100.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270)